LIFE DIGEST: Louisiana again most pro-life state

By Tom Strode
Jan 23, 2013

Louisiana again is the most pro-life state in the country, according to the latest rankings by Americans United for Life (AUL).

The Bayou State gained the top spot on AUL’s “Life List” for the second consecutive year and third time in four years. The top ranking means Louisiana is considered by the Washington, D.C.-based organization as the leader in protecting life in its public policies on such issues as abortion and physician-assisted suicide.

Also in this edition: Chinese official rejects repeal of ‘one-child’ policy and Deaf twins find doctors to euthanize them in Belgium.

Meanwhile, AUL again ranked Washington at No. 50, making it the least life-affirming state in its policies for the fourth consecutive year.

Released Jan. 17, AUL’s eighth annual ratings show these states in the top 10 behind Louisiana: (2) Oklahoma; (3) Pennsylvania; (4) Arkansas; (5) Arizona; (6) Nebraska; (7) Indiana; (8) Missouri; (9) Georgia, and (10) Virginia.

Joining Washington in the bottom 10 were: (49) California; (48) New York; (47) Vermont; (46) New Jersey; (45) Connecticut; (44) Oregon; (43) Maryland; (42) Hawaii, and (41) Montana.

The most-improved state was Arizona, which jumped from No. 14 to No. 5. Arizona enacted seven laws restricting abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization affiliated with abortion rights advocates. Those measures included a law banning abortion at 20 weeks gestation or later based on evidence a baby in the womb experiences pain by that point and such a late-term abortion is a risk to a woman’s health. That law was based on model legislation drafted by AUL.

States approved 43 abortion restrictions last year, making 2012 the second highest ever for such laws, Guttmacher reported. The record came in 2011, when states adopted 92 restrictions.

The most common state measures in 2012, according to AUL, included “prohibitions on government funding and insurance coverage for abortion, legislation and resolutions related to pregnancy care centers, informed consent for abortion, ultrasound requirements, restrictions or regulations on abortion-inducing drugs and [Webcam or] ‘telemed’ abortions, and abortion clinic regulations and other abortion provider requirements.”

AUL President Charmaine Yoest predicted in a written statement there will be “a large number of bills this year that also work to protect the First Amendment Freedom of all Americans who do not want to be forced into business with Big Abortion.”

The latest rankings may be accessed online.

Chinese official rejects repeal of ‘one-child’ policy

China’s leading family planning official appears to have squelched hopes the world’s most populous country may be near repeal of its notorious “one-child” policy.

“We must unwaveringly adhere to the One Child Policy as a national policy to stabilize the low birth rate as the primary task,” said Wang Xia, chairman of China’s National Population and Family Planning Commission.

Speaking at a national conference, Wang said the panel’s four primary jobs this year included maintaining “the One-child policy . . . and then improve the policy gradually. . . . It’s our priority.”

The Zhong Xin China News Agency reported Wang’s comments Jan. 14.

The remarks regarding a population control program that has forced abortion and sterilization upon millions of its citizens during the last three decades “should end speculation that China will abandon the One Child Policy in the foreseeable future,” pro-life leader Reggie Littlejohn said in a written statement. “Forced abortion up to the ninth month of pregnancy, and gendercide – the sex-selective abortion of baby girls – will continue until all coercive birth limits are abolished.

“The central issue in the One Child Policy is not whether the government allows couples to have one or two children,” said Littlejohn, president of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers. “Rather, it is the coercion with which this limit is enforced. Even with a two-child policy, women will still be subject to forced abortion if they get pregnant without a birth permit.”

Reports from China in recent months had raised hopes for some pro-lifers the country might be prepared to rescind its “one-child” policy. A Chinese government institute recommended in October the Communist regime establish a two-child policy in some provinces immediately and an end to all birth limits by 2020.

China’s population control program, which began officially in 1980, generally limits couples in urban areas to one child and those in rural areas to two, if the first is a girl. Parents in cities may have second babies if the husband and wife are both only children. Couples who violate the policy face the threat of large fines, job loss and imprisonment.

The policy also has resulted in many accounts of authorities carrying out forced abortions – even in the last three months of pregnancy — and sterilizations. There also have been many reports of infanticide, especially of female babies. The policy has helped produce a dramatic gender imbalance because of the Chinese preference for sons.

Deaf twins find doctors to euthanize them in Belgium

Twin brothers who were deaf and had learned they were going blind died by legal euthanasia in what appears to have been a questionable application of Belgian law.

Eddy and Marc Verbessem, 45, died Dec. 14 by lethal injection at the hands of doctors at Brussels University Hospital in Jette. They found doctors in that municipality of the Brussels region willing to euthanize them after their local hospital rejected their requests to kill them, the British newspaper The Telegraph reported Jan. 14.

Doctors at the Verbessem’s local hospital – they lived in the village of Putte – refused the twins’ request because they were not experiencing unbearable pain, a requirement in Belgium for euthanasia.

“If any blind or deaf are allowed to [euthanize], we are far from home,” the local doctors said, according to The Telegraph. “[We] do not think this was what the legislation meant by ‘unbearable suffering.’”

Wim Distelmans, the Brussels University doctor involved in euthanizing the twins, said in defense of the action, “It is certain that the twins meet all conditions for euthanasia.”

Chris Gastmans, a medical ethicist at Catholic University in Leuven, said the implications for the disabled are troubling.

“Is this the only humane response that we can offer in such situations? . . . Today it seems that euthanasia is the only right way to end life. And I think that’s not a good thing,” Gastmans said, according to The Telegraph. “In a society as wealthy as ours, we must find another, caring way to deal with human frailty.”

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to protect the sanctity of human life. If you would like to learn more about this issue, additional resources are available here. Our free, downloadable Impact resource is also available online. If your church is interested in purchasing materials on the sanctity of human life, please visit our online bookstore and

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion, End-of-Life Issues, Citizenship, National,

You May Also Like

Men, you must prevent domestic violence

By Thabiti Anyabwile - Aug 7, 2014 - (1)

When your job is to talk and you talk as much and as bombastically as Stephen A. Smith, you’re bound to say some things that get you into trouble. Usually Smith doesn’t care one bit. But last Friday the ESPN commentator made some comments about domestic violence that has him back pedaling and trying to explain himself.…

Read More

LIFE DIGEST: N.C. legislature fails to pay eugenics victims

By Tom Strode - Jun 27, 2012

The North Carolina legislature has turned back an effort to pay $50,000 apiece to people who were sterilized under the state’s eugenics program.

Lawmakers passed a $20.2 billion budget June 21 without the proposed compensation for victims who are still living, Reuters News Service reported.…

Read More
Parents need to grow up, too Thursday, January 24